Pages

22 June 2013

Rudolf Sieber Talks: Eggs, Marriage and Marlene Dietrich

(This interview with Rudolf Sieber was originally published in the The Milwaukee Sentinel, on 13 March 1960.)

By Jean C. Bosquet

On the side of the gate of a chicken ranch in San Fernando, California, not far from Hollywood, is a two-foot –square sign reading: “EGGS” and two cowbells with a cord attached to them.

Pull the cord, and the clatter of cowbells will bring a slight 62-year-old man hurrying from an outbuilding to take your order. He has a lean, pink, sensitive face with twinkling blue eyes, and wisps of sandy hair can be seen under the edge of his blue beret. He wears faded blue denims and rough work shoes. He is Rudolf Sieber, for 35 years the husband of exotic Marlene Dietrich, one of the world’s most glamorous women since she rocked to screen stardom in The Blue Angel.

Rudy Sieber has often been referred to during those years as the “forgotten” man in Marlene’s life, but if he’s been forgotten it hasn’t been by his 55-year-old actress wife. He, himself, has chosen to be the silent partner in the strangest marriage in all the history of show business. The couple has been separated by an ocean or a continent, or both, 90 percent of the time, and Marlene has been linked romantically with one dashing male celebrity after another.

Rudy Sieber has shunned interviewers since 1931, when another man’s ex-wife charged La Dietrich with alienation of affections and Rudy rushed to the defense of his beloved Marlene.

Why has this marriage survived the long separations, the vast difference in modes of living, and countless divorce rumours through the years?

Sieber was breaking a silence of almost 30 years when he answered, simply but intensely: “Because it’s as good a marriage today as it was in 1924, when it was performed. The bond between us is just as strong. Only death will end our marriage.”

What about the years when Marlene was reportedly in love with French actor Jean Gabin, then novelist Erich Remarque, then actor Michael Wilding, and most recently Iva S. V. Patcevitch, New York magazine executive?

“Of course she has been rumoured in love with this one and that one,” says Rudy. “She is a glamorous woman, and a glamorous woman is supposed to be surrounded by romance at all times.

What of the shocking contrast between the faded blue denims, the pink stucco bungalow, the littered ranch yard – and the glittering world that is Marlene’s?

“This is Marlene’s home,” said Rudy. “She has her apartments in New York and in Paris, but when she is in California she lives here. Our daughter, Maria Riva, and our three grandchildren spent last Easter here.
Will Marlene live permanently at the ranch when she retires?

“Why should she retire? She keeps getting better all the time. I went to Las Vegas twice to see her show at the Sahara and was as proud of her as I was 35 years ago, when she was just beginning. Now she’s appearing in Paris again, and how they love her there! Am I still in love with her? More than ever.”

And despite the fact that Marlene seldom speaks of her husband to any of her intimates of business associates, the devotion in this fabulous marriage doesn’t seem one-sided. When Rudy had a heart attack in 1956 Marlene sped from Paris to Los Angeles to be at his side until he was out of danger. In 1944, before he bought the chicken ranch, Marlene nursed him through pneumonia in a Hollywood apartment. And for more than two decades, it was Marlene who made the vehement denials when the divorce rumours recurred.

“You do not consider the possibility that love might have something to do with our marriage!” she cried out to one interviewer. “I consider Mr Sieber the perfect husband and father.”

Marlene was 20 when, in 1924, she was sent from the Max Reinhardt school of dramatic art in Berlin to a film studio for an extra’s job. There she met Rudy, an assistant casting director, who advised her to put up her long blonde hair. She took his advice and won a part. She married him on May 13 of that year and became a hausfrau. Their daughter Maria was born in 1925 and Marlene went back to screen work and the stage.

She was appearing in a satirical stage revue when director Josef von Sternberg saw her and cast her in the role opposite Emil Jannings in The Blue Angel, which was being filmed in Germany. The movie catapulted Marlene to stardom when it was released in 1930, and von Sternberg brought her to Hollywood where Paramount Pictures signed her and, with von Sternberg’s guidance, she went into an orbit in which she’s still spinning.

But only a year later von Sternberg’s wife, Riza, after divorcing him, sued Marlene for “stealing” the director’s love. That’s when Rudy Sieber stoutly declared: “I know that the charge against my wife is utterly unfounded.”

The case never did reach court, and from that day until now, Rudy has never felt it necessary to invade the area spotlighted for his perennially spectacular wife.

[1933]
“I have never wanted publicity, and I don’t want it now,” he said. “What good would publicity have done me when I was an assistant casting director, or when I worked for Paramount in Paris, or when I dubbed foreign version films at 20th Century-Fox in Hollywood? And what do I want with publicity now? I don’t need it to sell my eggs.”

Rudy began his chicken ranching in 1953 because he was “tired of living in big cities” and wanted seclusion and quiet. Now he has 9 000 chickens and employs several helpers. He’s highly regarded in the San Fernando Valley community and doesn’t want his desire for seclusion to be taken as meaning he’s a recluse.

“How can I be called a recluse? I go to visit my friend in Hollywood and Beverly Hills, and they come to visit me and Marlene comes here too, doesn’t she? Is that being a recluse?”


He basks in the radiation of his wife’s glamour as she suns herself in the ranch yard or slinks through the rooms of the bungalow which, for him, is reward enough for being “forgotten”.

20 comments:

  1. How great,but didn't really say much.Still very tight-lipped.Paul

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, he was very defensive. Great that the journalist tracked him down, though.

      missladiva

      Delete
  2. Missladiva, I don't think I've ever seen that photo from the set of Destry Rides Again! Thanks for posting all these photos & the article! I ought to ask some San Fernando Valley history buffs whether they can get the scoop on Rudi's chicken coop. There have got to be people who remember ringing those cowbells.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was located in Sylmar, Calif. The corner of Polk and Dronefield. People said her Limo was there every so often when she would come and stay with him.

      Delete
    2. Thanks! It looks more like a ramshackle backyard than the ranch it's always portrayed as being. But Marlene did visit there often, even in the 1970s.

      Delete
    3. That's a great story about the limo. I have Rudi's address as
      14265 Polk St, Sylmar, CA 91342 but don't recall what my source was.

      Delete
    4. Nix that. I found a source: http://www.newspapers.com/newspage/30257373/

      Delete
  3. I lived on that ranch from the time Rudy passed till 2000. I bought it from Marlene. What would you like to know?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Kerry, just noted this site. I was going to send this article to you, but here you are. Note: I was the husband of the above woman for 20 yrs.. We had a lot of fun out on that ol' ranch

      Delete
    2. Do you have any pictures of the house. It looked like a lovely tudor from what I could see behind the hedges. It's been changed unfortunately.I wonder if the new tenants knew what a treasure they had.

      Delete
  4. Did they ever divorce ? what on earth did happen to them/him?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They never divorced. Aside from the complications that arose due to his health problems and the 1971 Sylmar earthquake, Rudi probably lived life just as he described it in this interview because he remained at this chicken "ranch" in San Fernando (well, more specifically, the neighborhood of Sylmar in the Los Angeles area). What's interesting about this article to me is that I think Rudi's lover Tami ought to have still been living with him and was not yet at the Camarillo State Mental Hospital, but she must have gone unnoticed by or was in hiding from this interviewer.

      Delete
  5. It is the personality of Merelen that kept their love bandage in between them, when you read her recorded impressions ( 100 of them or more) you can see how that woman really understood life and the great value of love in achieving best relations in life.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Very informatve !

    ReplyDelete
  7. She was a very beautiful woman-and one hell of an actress.She led a well deserved life that we all wish we could have enjoyed like Marlene did.May she be at peace 'on the other side'.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What a lovely Love Story 💞🌺💞

    ReplyDelete
  9. Good Comments ..... They stayed married and no one was forcing Their hands! - but just like the Predatory Nature of human beings, the Press want to destroy/break what to Rudy & Marlene, was a satisfactory relationship? ..... the press have done more Damage than enough with people's lives! PS The Maria Riva biography of Her Mother though, is Brilliant when all is said and done.
    Phil Liverpool UK 🇬🇧

    ReplyDelete
  10. I beg to deviate from the popular (and often hypocritical) view, as epitomised by most comments here. In my view, the so-called marriage was nothing more than a union of convenience by two selfish individuals. The man simply wanted to bask in the shameless glory of the limelight afforded by his world-renowned philandering actor "wife" and the cool money that the woman brought home. Nothing like true love there. No man can truly continue loving their wife, if they visualise their wife being properly chewed by another man as they normally do. Unless of course there is a more than weird reason behind it as I have highlighted. On the other hand, there is nothing women love more than their husbands allowing them free reign to freely dish out their booties to all and sundry without the fear of being held to account. And hence the enduring nature of this relationship. Well, those are my humble opinions.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Well , in my view, this was just a marriage of convenience, being held fast by treacherous interests: The man simply wanting to continue basking in the shameless glory of the limelight afforded by his world-renowned philandering actor wife and the resultant cool money she brought home, while the woman stayed on simply because the man did not hold her to account for her promiscuity and instead actually robustly defended her against such accusations, the inextricable reality that he knew, about her behaviour, and this by his own admission alluded to here, notwithstanding.

    ReplyDelete