12 February 2012

Vanished Vestments

To keep the goon squad's interest, let's talk about some famous Marlene Dietrich duds that have disappeared. Back in the late '80s, Los Angeles Times assiduously reported on the Hollywood relics that the City of Los Angeles Department of Recreation and Parks had acquired from the then-(and still-)defunct Hollywood Museum Associates. For criminally demanding costly upkeep, these treasures were eventually sentenced to the decommissioned Lincoln Heights jail, where their Hollywood connection ironically continued. Because the jail served as a filming location for chefs d'oeuvre such as Chained Heat, these captive costumes and memorabilia allegedly became swag for thieving film crews.

This story described one such stolen goodie as "a white tuxedo worn in 1935 by Dietrich in The Devil Is a Woman." Oh, yes. I remember that scene as if it were yesterday. Concha gets deported from some South Pacific island for inciting barroom brawls yet manages to become a Russian empress who earns chump change as a clip joint floozy, coaxing electrical workers to squander their paychecks on apples. This must be from the scene in mind:
Obviously, this is not Concha, but Helen from Blonde Venus
Because the L.A. Times writer didn't cite the right Dietrich film, I wonder whether this costume was in fact snatched from some jail cell. Someone posted this photo of a white tuxedo displayed at the Filmmuseum Berlin as the one from Blonde Venus, but it's surely a tux from Dietrich's later cabaret career, isn't it? It reminds me an awful lot of the tux featured on the Dietrich in Rio LP cover. Whatever the truth is, the FIDM Museum blog continues to spoil us by sharing high-quality images of Dietrich-owned items on loan from the Dept. of Recreation and Parks, such as this pair of custom-made Delmans. Dietrich didn't need to dance when she could get the party started with those disco balls on her heels.

With all this Blonde Venus tux talk, I'd like to pay my respects to the late Whitney Houston, who referenced Dietrich, the Supremes, and Audrey Hepburn in her "I'm Your Baby Tonight" music video (the American and European versions below, to appeal to this blog's international readers).

American version:

European version:

Musically speaking, I prefer the American version, which exemplifies Houston's foray into harder-edged R&B after the 1989 Soul Train Awards audience booed her R&B/urban contemporary nomination for "Where Do Broken Hearts Go?"--a power-pop ballad whose soul truly is difficult to discern. The house remix of the European "I'm Your Baby Tonight" release nullifies this context, which may be inconsequential to non-American audiences who have never lived in the U.S. to experience its race relations, where crossover artists can be treated like traitors or nonentities. Think Houston's cousin, Dionne Warwick.

In terms of images, I don't notice any difference between the the videos' Dietrich homages. I will point out, however, that--although the tuxedo color, backup dancers, setting, and hand-grabbing certainly mirror the Blonde Venus comeback performance--the scene amalgamates some Morocco images, particularly Houston's reclining pose at the beginning and the flirtation between Houston and her female audience members.

Despite those nods, no lesbian kisses take place, and Houston tops a male audience member with her hat rather than presenting him with a flower. Also, Houston's video reconfigures the gender-bending with a sort of trompe l'oeil that led me to mistake the slender-necked male love interest for a lady in Josephine Baker drag. As for Baker, some credit her as the influence of Houston's video, but this begs me to argue in favor of Dietrich:

"Whatever you want from me, I'm giving you everything," sang Miss Houston, but none of us deserved so much.

09 February 2012

Why I Won't Shop At TCM Vault Again

Like Marlene Dietrich, I cannot stand incompetence, and
TCM Vault will never have my business again. Here's my story.

On January 18, I went online to order Pre-Code Double Feature DVD Set (SKU ID#6445-360560)--the one that features The Song of Songs--and pre-order Marlene Dietrich Double Feature: Dishonored & Shanghai Express (DVD) (SKU ID#6445-364907). While processing my order, the TCM Vault website ran sluggishly, leading me to worry that my order wasn't completing. Indeed, I got a message stating that my order didn't go through. But then I got confirmation emails.

Yes, my order not only went through, it triplicated, showing 6 items on my order details page. Reading on the TCM Vault site that the customer service hours are from 7am to midnight, I realized that I--the ordering night owl--would have to call in the morning. Thus, when I woke up, I made a call on Jan. 18 at about 8:30am. Let me emphasize that everyone with whom I spoke at 1-888-982-6746 was polite, but no one seemed capable of performing simple tasks. The customer service agent could not remove the added items on my order and told me she had to submit a "ticket"  for TCM Vault's tech people to address, even though nothing had yet shipped.

Well, by the January 19, I got a shipping confirmation email, prompting me to call TCM Vault customer service again (this time just after 7am!). The customer service agent's recommendation was that I print out some packing labels to send the packages back once they had arrived. I thought to myself, "No, that's ridiculous," and asked whether I could refuse the packages. The agent told me the package might just get dropped off at my door, but I did indeed see that I could refuse the package in the TCM Vault FAQ. That didn't stop TCM Vault (or, more exactly, the company that "powers" them--Delivery Agent, Inc.) from posting 3 pending charges of $59.05 to my account. What a lovely sight to see at the end of the month, when bills are due.

So I had to wait until UPS dropped off the packages at my door at who-knows-what-time-because-I-was-at-work on Jan. 24. Before I even got home, I called up UPS to pick up the packages and called my bank to cancel the unwanted charges. By the way, the charges ended up being less, but--for some odd reason--all the charges were different (one over $30, another about $27, and yet another about $25), even though they were all clearly associated with 3 copies of the same item--the DVD that featured The Song of Songs. Wondering whether I'd face more complications, I considered doing a giveaway, but the DVD featuring The Song of Songs isn't worth it. That would be like giving away Madonna's American Life CD.

Somehow, this mess seemed to get cleared up. UPS picked up the package containing the 2 DVD copies that I did not order, I got Customer Service to cancel the two extra copies of Marlene Dietrich Double Feature: Dishonored & Shanghai Express in my order details, and the unwanted charges were refunded to my bank account. All I had to do at this point was look forward to receiving my copy of Marlene Dietrich Double Feature: Dishonored & Shanghai Express, which would become available after Feb. 5.

Now, guess what I found lying in front of my door after I got home from work this evening? The same package that I had already refused and had UPS pick up. Once again, I had to call TCM Vault, my bank, and UPS to ensure that this mess gets fixed. I was excited about getting the Dishonored/Shanghai Express DVD because Dishonored is in fact my favorite early American Dietrich movie and--after watching the The Song of Songs DVD that I had kept--I was expecting high-quality footage. Whether my conjecture is accurate, I won't know anytime soon because I refuse to do business with TCM Vault again. The customer service agent had the nerve to ask me whether I wanted to order the DVD on the phone--but why bother when they can't fix their computer's mistakes, can't stop unwanted shipments, and send back shipments that customers have already refused?

I'll just have to wait until I find it through another vendor. Let me assure you, though, that I will have a royal hissy fit if the Feb. 6 charge of $27.05 doesn't get fully credited back to my bank account because the customer service agent initially said I'd be getting $24.99 back. I will not pay for OTHERS' shipping errors. In the meantime, I will have to redirect all the emails that TCM sends me to my spam folder. After a over a decade of perfectly smooth business dealings online at Amazon, Ebay, BuyDig, Orbitz, Kayak, and others, I never expected that a vendor specializing in classic films would embody what Dietrich exclaimed in Schell's documentary:

Amateurs!

Edited to add: I should tell you how to refuse a package left at your door by UPS in case you must because the information TCM Vault site and the UPS site give is unclear. My apologies, but I can only assert that this advice applies to the U.S.

1) Call UPS ( 1-800-742-5877 aka 1-800-PICK-UPS)

2) Dial "0" because the automated options won't help you.

3) The automated service won't like that you dialed "0" and will repeat automated options. Dial "0" again.

4) Yay! You should connect to a human being! Now, be sure that you have your tracking number (which should be on the package you wish to refuse) because you will have to give this number to the UPS customer service agent. Within less than a minute, the customer service agents were able to schedule a day for refused packages to be picked up from my doorstep, and I hope the same is possible for you.

30 January 2012

Is 2012 the Year of the Costume?

On the FIDM Museum blog, there's an announcement about the 20th Annual Art of Motion Picture Costume Design exhibition, which will run from February 14 through April 28, 2012. Naturally, at least one costume worn by Dietrich will be on display. Which one(s)? I don't know. Previously, the FIDM Museum blog has featured two items worn by Dietrich, one designed by Travis Banton and the other by Irene. If I understand this interview correctly, FIDM Museum has many items worn by Dietrich (the second-largest collection, in fact, after the MDCB) on long-term loan from a bureaucratic unit called the Department of Recreation and Parks, City of Los Angeles, Historic Hollywood Collection. Catchy name, no? Another FIDM Museum blog describes a cream dress and cape from Desire that was on display at the Oklahoma City Museum of Art in 2010. Whatever we get to see, we should be grateful. The exhibition's free!

28 January 2012

Polskie Radio Gold

Terry Sanderson pointed me to a recently-posted Polskie Radio interview that Marlene Dietrich gave during her first Warsaw concert appearance in 1964, which you can hear here. Typically, introductions and commentary are rife with well-known biographical facts, but hosts Anna Piwowarska and Peter Gentle share Poland-related Dietrichiana that make the entire program--not just the 1964 interview--worth hearing.

With anecdotes from Angelika Kuźniak's Polish-language biography on Dietrich, Marlene, the hosts blend the personal with the professional. Gentle calls Dietrich "eccentric" for bringing 35 suitcases, claiming to have thin eyelids, and cleaning her hotel bathroom with chloroform. Piwowarska speculates that Dietrich banned photography at her concert because the flash cameras would have exposed her mythical foundation. Imagine what Dietrich would do if faced with the TSA's full-body scanners!

Piwowarska and Gentle relate many more stories, but I do want to highlight a professional and Poland-related one: Czesław Niemen led Dietrich's warm-up band and performed "Czy mnie jeszcze pamiętasz?"--a song that Dietrich later recorded with self-penned German lyrics as "Mutter, hast Du mir vergeben?" EMI has already had this Dietrich track removed from YouTube, as far as I can tell, but you can purchase or preview it on Amazon.

Regarding the interview, Dietrich mentioned that she enjoyed the vodka and Russian champagne, that she took a trip to the Warsaw ghetto, and that she and Polish audiences shared a mutual love for sad songs--which would explain why she took to Nieman's song. While listening to the program, I also realized that the archived footage audio was used in Schell's documentary. I never knew that Dietrich was speaking to a Warsaw audience in that clip! By the way, Piwowarska stated that Dietrich conducted interviews in French and German, so Polskie Radio's likely got more in their archives worth exploring.

So much is said, so do take a listen! Oh, and if you want to see a photo of Dietrich from her 1964 Warsaw trip, see this Flickr link. For another clip, watch this.

25 January 2012

Taking Shots at Lady Lush

Tallulah Bankhead was an intoxicating character whose words you couldn't properly transcribe without italizing and CAPITALIZING, and--for years--I thought her surname was DARLING. Hopefully, we haven't already posted a clip from her 1950s NBC radio program, The Big Show, because I wouldn't want to commit the sin of repetition. On YouTube, many have already shared an excerpt from the January 7, 1951 show in which Dietrich guest starred, but the entire episode deserves a listen (even more than this lot legend about gold dust deserves a read). Available from Internet Archive, here it is:


When the guest stars introduce themselves, you may recognize some names associated with Dietrich: Fred Allen (whose Texaco Star Theater radio show featured Dietrich, readily available on TallulahDarling's YouTube page), Edward G. Robinson (Dietrich's Manpower co-star), and Danny Thomas (who went on that famous European USO tour with Dietrich).

During the show, Dietrich's appearance is hyped up, with Bankhead playfully demanding equal footing, as you'll hear in her exchange with singer Fran Warren.

WARREN: Oh, I'm very excited, Tallulah, what with Marlene Dietrich on the show. She's so glamorous!
BANKHEAD: Uh, I've heard that said about me, darling.
WARREN: And she's such an international celebrity.
BANKHEAD: I've heard THAT said about me, darling, TOO.
WARREN: I remember she was my ideal when I was a child!
BANKHEAD: And I've heard THAT said abou--UH! [laughs] OH, DARLING!

Once Dietrich makes her "appearance" 45 minutes into the show, it's one punchline after another. Dietrich then sings "Falling in Love Again" but not just the way she sang it--as Bankhead says--"35 years ago." This rendition features some over-the-top yet ethereal "ah-ah-ah"-ing choir, like in Mario Lanza's "Be My Love." Enjoy!

23 January 2012

No Sky in the Eye's Way

See the real "painted photograph" here
How cruel of magazine and newspaper editors to exclude Marlene Dietrich's trunk from all the fun. In the spirit of trash art, I've remixed an already-edited production still (on the right), dismissing Dietrich's face in favor of her apparently discarded torso, an exquisite physical feature carefully constructed by a solid foundation and almost as deserving of idol worship as her legs, whose beauty required no effort. Oh, you probably wanted to see the authentic edited picture. Well, click here and scroll down, where you'll find the No Highway in the Sky promotional shot that misleadingly blurs Dietrich's middle finger.

If you prefer to view the non-digital rendering of the analog-edited image, visit the Painted Photographs exhibit, which will run until March 18, 2012 at the Open Eye Gallery in Liverpool. On display from photographer Martin Parr's private collection are the so-called "painted photographs" of celebrities such as Dietrich. Museum goers will see how the press used to crop photographs before the preeminence of digital editing tools such as Photoshop. What they'll think, I don't know, but Sean O'Hagan of The Observer aptly called these hand-edited images "a kind of found art."

Although Andre Breton comes to mind at the mention of found art, I wouldn't compare his work to this exhibit. Maybe Parr initially discovered a press-edited image by chance, but these photos eventually became objects that he consciously sought, given that they represent a collection that took years and trips to the United States to assemble. Instead, this exhibit reminds me of Marcel Duchamp's readymade works, such as the "Fountain" that I remember reading about years ago in some introductory art history course. It raises questions about authorship (Is it the work of the photographer, the pencil-wielding editor, Parr, blah, blah, blah?), artistic merits (Are these press images, which were originally produced for commercial purposes, art? The Open Eye Gallery's "About Us" page would have us believe they are.), and also defacement (Did press staff vandalize these images by scribbling on them?).

That Parr could put his flea market finds in a space devoted to displaying art answers the "Is it art?" question in the affirmative, as far as I'm concerned. As for the issue of vandalism, I wouldn't bother considering it. These images were made to be modified by publications; in fact, Phaidon upholds the practice by cropping the Dietrich image for their online article. Now, who's the author? That I can't answer. Dietrich might raise her hand from the grave, as it was, of course, her face that made the photo (and, obviously, that work of art was all the editors wanted from the shot).

20 January 2012

Rapid Round-Up

Yesterday, the 1930 Rolls-Royce Phantom that had appeared in Morocco sold for $524,000 at the Scottsdale, Arizona Bonhams auction.

The Guardian reported that the Banton-designed Angel gown will glitter at the Victoria and Albert Museum in London much later this year. The museum website, however, mentions Morocco?

Julian Casablancas of The Strokes interviewed Robby Krieger and Ray Manzarek of The Doors, and Manzarek discussed being a student at UCLA, where he learned about butterfly lighting from Josef von Sternberg.

Add more in the comments section if I missed something recent.